Do we have to wonder? Some form of heat shield would be required, but that is a fairly simple matter to build. These types of asteroids probably have windows of a few months. Thus to detect a point on a target, there must be at least two different antenna echoes from that point.
For simplicity, we Optically steered phased array radar that energy does not suffer from slope-response and other losses; Hence, the full energy has to be provided during 1.
This holds the leaders hostage to the people, ensuring they go through with their side of the bargain. There would also be some blast, but the exact dynamics of the outcome are currently unknown to the author. This represents a possible echo from a target at that position.
Another potentially serious problem is entry heating. First off, small asteroids are not suitable for use in this manner. Higher altitudes have lower accuracy due to increased range, but greater availability per pass, thanks to the higher angle.
The delta-V requirements for deployment vary significantly, depending on range and entry angle. In the case of the system mentioned in the Air Force report above, a 6.
Later I will express below my doubts whether high power transmitter were used; at least unlikely in conjunction to Mammut.
The angle of fire through the atmosphere is a potential problem when shooting at higher latitudes. It might have been even of special NVK design. Then they started drunkwalking their shots around the valley, blasting walls, barracks, everything left of the fortress flat.
The system described in the United States Air Force report was that of foot-long 6. And being extremely destructive, Orbital Ground Support is only utilized in extreme circumstances. This is because 3 kilometers per second is 1 Rick, which means each kilogram of rod is equal to one kilogram of TNT, so why not just drop TNT from a conventional bomber?
It is moving like a bat out of hell, er, ah, has a very high closing velocity, and it has a tiny radar cross section. This is clearly within U. If the launching platform is at an altitude of km, the flight time will be approximately 75 minutes, while a geostationary launcher will have a flight time of about 12 hours, although these can be reduced somewhat with more delta-V.
While this might occasionally be the goal, it falls outside the scope of this paper. This is unlikely, to say the least. See takt 40 gB and therefore can rely upon this valuable source of information. The cost of a comparable nuclear weapon is almost certain to be no greater than that of the asteroid-deflection operation, particularly when the fleet operations costs are factored in, and depending on the technologies involved, it is very likely to be significantly less.Good evening, have just been viewing your excellent detailed site about the Mammut radar system, and was surprised to see the pictures of the twin tube display unit, taken at the Norfolk and Suffolk Aviation Museum, Flixton, Suffolk, U.K.
is and in to a was not you i of it the be he his but for are this that by on at they with which she or from had we will have an what been one if would who has her.
A consideration for this: If warfare is about causing the maximum destruction, these space siege scenarios make sense.
If warfare is about achieving political objectives by other means, you need to either leave someone to negotiate the surrender with, or leave something worth occupying.
Here are older questions and answers processed by "Ask the Physicist!". If you like my answer, please consider making a donation to help support this service.
A synthetic-aperture radar is an imaging radar mounted on a moving platform. Electromagnetic waves are transmitted sequentially, the echoes are collected and the system electronics digitizes and stores the data for subsequent processing. C.
C-E -- Communications-Electronics C2 -- Command and Control C3 -- Command, Control, and Communications C3BM -- C3 for Battle Management C3CM -- C3 Countermeasures.Download